![]() But you really need an automated script with lots of fidelity when you're dealing with a huge bulk of frames organized in a non-standard way (that is to say, there is no widely accepted standard way of organizing the frames of a rendered isometric image and so constructing a general solution for that is incredibly difficult.) ![]() Texture-packer etc are good for small sprite-sheets or sets of sprite-sheets. ![]() Using Texture-packer (or any command line utility) would make doing this incredibly tedious - they do not map in a compatible fashion to the directory structure I had to use, the naming conventions used etc. That's over several thousand frames that need to be compiled into individual sprite-sheets (on a per action basis.) Each frame was rendered into a separate png. ![]() Each character was rendered at 8 different angles for ~13 different actions. For example, my use case was transforming a bunch of rendered images (for an isometric game.) However IMO it still lacks the fidelity you get with Python and Wand.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |